[CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure

[Brian Stinson]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, at 11:47, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 19/06/2019 17:43, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > 
> <snip>
> >>
> >> Does that mean having the add-ons like ha/rs going either to BaseOS (for
> >> simple packages) or to AppStream (if built as modules") ?
> > 
> > There are some HA and RT components that are shipped to CentOS BaseOS,
> > but these are separate from the HighAvailability and RT variants in
> > upstream. We won't ship the HA or RT variants.
> > 
> 
> I mean RS and not RT, but same concept/idea :)
> So do you mean that we have sources landed on git.centos.org, that we
> have eventually built but that we'll not ship ? If so that contrasts
> with what we used to do and would like to know why
> 
> -- 
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> 
> 
> *Attachments:*
>  * signature.asc

To say this a different way. If it gets pushed to a c8 branch, it goes in BaseOS (again, an oversimplification because there are 1 or 2 exceptions, but close enough). I'd like to *not* maintain HighAvailability/ResilientStorage/etc. as separate variant repos in CentOS. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190619/e1e57c11/attachment.html>