[CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure
Karanbir Singh
kbsingh at centos.orgThu Jun 20 10:14:49 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 19/06/2019 23:36, Brian Stinson wrote: >> >> Would something like above snapshot idea have any legs? >> >> >> V/r, >> James Cassell > > What's the use-case for the snapshot structure like this from a consumer's perspective? > I think doing static tree's once or twice a year to mark the boundary state is good enough from the provider ( CentOS Linux ) perspective, since there is the entire media and delivery stack that lines up with it. We do it internally inside the CentOS infra, for local consumption and I think if someone is going to need this level of granularity, then as was mentioned earlier in the thread, a local Spacewalk install ( or something such ), would be the way to go. regards -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190620/71b137cf/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RFC: CentOS 8 Repository Structure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list