On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 09:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > We are having issues with drpms on CentOS-6 i386 and x86_64 and on > CentOS-7 x86_64. > > The technical issues sometimes cause us to have to rebuild all drpms > over again .. and the time involved is very large. Also storing the > drpms and moving them around takes up a lot of space and bandwidth. So, for whatever it's worth, when we first introduced drpms into Fedora, the idea was to only keep them for GA -> n and n-1 -> n. This limited drpms to a maximum of two per package and made them far easier to manage, while still providing drpms for the common cases (updating a brand new install and doing regular updates). I don't know how much use it would be, but I did write a tool a decade ago, I think called prunedrpms in the presto-utils package, that would remove old drpms. It's unmaintained and was retired retired years ago, but it might help with this use-case. On the other hand, drpms have been pretty useless in Fedora for well over a year now[1] (old drpms get removed every compose, which means they're only available if you update every single day), and there are questions over there about whether or not it's worth it to keep building them. That's an indicator that it may be time to retire them. Jonathan 1: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190604/01645a64/attachment-0008.sig>