On 24/06/2019 12:42, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 19/06/2019 19:42, Brian Stinson wrote: >>>>> I need to be able to run installs against a mirror, weeks and months >>>>> apart and arrive at the same payload installed exactly. > >>> again, this maybe just a case of publishing a 2nd set of metadata rather >>> than retain the base rpm set, but we need to retain this functionality. > >> Wouldn't pinning versions be better here if that's what you need? If you >> took that same kickstart over to a RHEL machine, you'd get the updates >> over there. > > no, you would get a point release ( same as media .. ) if you wanted to. > I want to make sure we dont lose that ability in CentOS, so were going > to need to do this. > Would be indeed worth clarifying, as I was under the impression that Brian said the reverse with "all updates would land in BaseOS" and so BaseOS would be a moving target ... @Brian : can we clarify once for all this ? -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190624/0bd6afaf/attachment-0008.sig>