On 24/06/2019 13:09, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 24/06/2019 13:05, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 24/06/2019 12:42, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> On 19/06/2019 19:42, Brian Stinson wrote: >>>>>>> I need to be able to run installs against a mirror, weeks and months >>>>>>> apart and arrive at the same payload installed exactly. >>> >>>>> again, this maybe just a case of publishing a 2nd set of metadata rather >>>>> than retain the base rpm set, but we need to retain this functionality. >>> >>>> Wouldn't pinning versions be better here if that's what you need? If you >>>> took that same kickstart over to a RHEL machine, you'd get the updates >>>> over there. >>> >>> no, you would get a point release ( same as media .. ) if you wanted to. >>> I want to make sure we dont lose that ability in CentOS, so were going >>> to need to do this. >>> >> >> Would be indeed worth clarifying, as I was under the impression that >> Brian said the reverse with "all updates would land in BaseOS" and so >> BaseOS would be a moving target ... >> >> @Brian : can we clarify once for all this ? >> > > 2 diff things, > > a) BaseOS will get all the content from a point release and all updates > will land in the same directory > > b) we snapshot the repo metadata and publish it in addition to the > baseos repo ( what was called the kickstart repo ). > > we can do both. > Again, this is *how* you see this, but it can differ from how that will be composed, reason why we probably need a kind of formal plan (in the wiki ?) to have $latest version of this thread, instead of trying to read "between the lines" what was said or not, etc .. :-) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190625/ad4a533a/attachment-0008.sig>