Am 06.11.19 um 18:35 schrieb Brian Stinson: <snip> > > The problems we need to solve if we decide to ship these packages somewhere in > a CentOS artifact: > > - Communicate that these packages are provided as-is and are not meant for > runtime dependencies Is a separate repo with a expressive name and corresponding wiki page not enough (like CR)? > > - Provide the packages in a form that is consumable for individuals and the > EPEL community > > I'd like to propose that we create a separate repository, disabled by default > that is composed of the -devel packages that we care about, bundled in a module.\ Why modules? What problem gets addressed? Why not just dropping the unshipped build output into a separate repo? -- Leon