[CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
Nico Kadel-Garcia
nkadel at gmail.comSat Oct 19 02:22:27 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Centos Atomic deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:36 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel <centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > The bug report was open by me and communicates the missing > libbluray-devel package. Its closed now with "WONTFIX" ... > > I did the same for libXvMC-devel and its assigned now. High > probability that it will land in the CRB repo (maybe EL8.1). Is there any explanation given? It's quite troubling that Red Hat has chosen to publish the LGPLv2 licensed binaries with source but without the devel package.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Centos Atomic deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list