[CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
Scott Dowdle
dowdle at montanalinux.orgSat Oct 19 14:44:40 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > In the case of libbluray-devel, it's because Red Hat only uses a very > small piece of that library, and doesn't want to have to support the > whole library, including being liable for CVEs and other bugs in the > parts of the library it doesn't use. Thanks for reiterating that. It totally makes sense for the package in question. TYL, -- Scott Dowdle 704 Church Street Belgrade, MT 59714 (406)388-0827 [home] (406)994-3931 [work]
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list