On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:23 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any explanation given? It's quite troubling that Red Hat has > chosen to publish the LGPLv2 licensed binaries with source but without > the devel package. > Troubling? Why is it troubling? Since you mention the GPL, the GPL only requires that the source be provided, and it is. -devel packages are an artifact of Red Hat's (and Fedora's and CentOS's) RPM packaging. The GPL doesn't mention -devel packages. And just to set expectations, it appears the libXvMC-devel package will most likely not appear in RHEL's Code Ready Builder or CentOS's AppStream until 8.2. -- Kaleb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20191019/296bc367/attachment-0006.html>