[CentOS-devel] Origin RPMs for ppc64le

Fabian Arrotin arrfab at centos.org
Mon Sep 9 08:53:58 UTC 2019


On 09/09/2019 10:28, Daniel Comnea wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:03 PM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org
> <mailto:arrfab at centos.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On 06/09/2019 11:15, Peeyush Gupta wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >  
>     > For koji builds for origin
>     > package: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3175, I see
>     > some builds have mulitarch package (including x86_64/aarch64/ppc64le
>     > etc). But in the pass repo: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/, I
>     > don't see any multi-arch option. There are only x86_64 packages. 
>     >  
>     > Is there is a way to make all these packages
>     > (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin311/)
>     > available for other archs as well? What would be required to get this
>     > done? I wold like to volunteer for any help required to get this done.
>     >  
>     > Thanks and regards,
>     > Peeyush Gupta
>     >
> 
>     It's a PaaS SIG decision to add/remove arch to tags/targets in Koji/CBS.
>     I see that those were enabled for 311 but not for 312 :
>     https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=1494
>     https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=1498
> 
> [DC]: there was work done before the summer on 311 to enable multi-arch
> and since we lack any resources on testing i know the folks @RH started
> to run some tests internally.
> 
> Regarding 312 -> there won't be any newer release since 311 OKD was the
> last one of 3.x.
> As for 4.x at this point there are no plans to release it on m.o.c
> however we'll review how things evolve over 6-12 months after we see the
> first drop of OKD 4.x (currently doesn't exist)
> 
> 
>     Once packages are built, they are added to repos/tree at the koji side
>     (through mash)
> 
>     For packages (tagged as -testing) to appear on
>     https://buildlogs.centos.org , or for  those tagged as -release to
>     appear on mirror.centos.org <http://mirror.centos.org>, SIG chair
>     has to create PR against the
>     following git repo, so that next time the signing process will be
>     kicked, it will push those out after having signed the tree :
>     https://git.centos.org/centos/cbs-content-control
> 
>     So, at this stage, it should be a discussion with the PaaS SIG chair.
>     @Daniel : willing to comment on that ?
> 
> *@Dennis* -> any chance you can let us know how the testing went ? Based
> on your answer i'm happy to kick the process to push the multi-arch to
> m.c.o repo
>  

Just as a reminder : ci.centos.org has ppc64le/aarch64 nodes available
for multi-arch, that's how RDO is also tested there.
Reference : https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Multiarch


-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190909/0a267b57/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list