[CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:35 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/24/19 1:31 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 13:25 -0700, Jim Perrin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/24/19 11:50 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:24 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Okay, now that the release is out, and everything is announced
> >>>> properly.
> >>>> I'm happy to answer questions about Stream.
> >>>
> >>> Does the Stream change the way to contributing to a specific
> >>> package on CentOS?
> >>
> >> "It depends". It's a snarky answer, but it's true.
> >>
> >>> One of the main complaints from libosinfo consumers is how outdated
> >>> the library is when CentOS is released (we have upstream releases
> >>> of
> >>> our database monthly). What would be the best way to get our
> >>> library
> >>> always up-to-date taking advantage of Streams?
> >>
> >> We have to realize that stream is intended to target the next RHEL
> >> release, so if you didn't see packages being rapidly rebased before,
> >> you
> >> probably shouldn't expect that to change. If it's a simple fix, a
> >> feature addition that you've backported, that sort of thing, then the
> >> vision would be a pull request and discussion, with the goal of
> >> having
> >> that merged in.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Where will primary discussion and submissions related to streams take
> > place? WIl the primary be the CentOS bug tracker or Red Hat bugzilla?
>
> The discussion will be here on the -devel mailing list. We're currently
> using the CentOS bug tracker, but we have been exploring the idea of
> using either RH's bugzilla, or Jira (don't make that face).
>

*makes the face at the thought of JIRA*

I'd like to see usage of the Red Hat Bugzilla. It'd make it much
easier to connect bugs across RHEL, Fedora, and CentOS...


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!