[CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.orgMon Sep 30 16:39:05 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 01:48:55PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > with CentOS 8. Would alternative desktops such as MATE (or KDE, etc.) > > > continue to be published via the EPEL repository, or could new packages > > > be introduced via "streams"? How does the contribution model for > > > streams differ from EPEL packagers? [...] > > Ignoring lots of the "we haven't built it yet" mechanics, contributing > > to a SIG or EPEL should be reasonably similar. There may be guidelines > > or policy variance, but that should be about it. [...] > Anyway, what I'm saying is that I'd much rather desktops stay in EPEL > rather than be pulled into CentOS streaming, and then possibly RHEL. I think the ideal state here is that EPEL packages and modules are easily and seamlessly available in CentOS Stream. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list