On 9/10/19 3:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >> Then we will get back to CentOS 8 .. since because no one has it yet .. >> it is not a priority. >> > > It's unfortunate that CentOS 8 has taken a backseat to CentOS 7.7, > because the release of CentOS 8 is the pre-requisite for a lot of > folks (including myself) for bootstrapping support for RHEL 8 for a > lot of folks, since CentOS 8 can be freely shared... > > Red Hat and IBM need to know how you use CentOS Linux to make RHEL better or use it to influence buying RHEL .. why don't you blog about it. That goes for anyone who uses CentOS Linux and because CentOS Linux exists, you have RHEL subscriptions. And explain why you would not have those RHEL subscriptions if CentOS Linux did not exist. Thanks, Johnny hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190910/f3598d4b/attachment-0006.sig>