On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 16:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:35 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> > wrote: > > > > > > On 9/24/19 1:31 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 13:25 -0700, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > > On 9/24/19 11:50 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:24 PM Jim Perrin < > > > > > jperrin at centos.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Okay, now that the release is out, and everything is > > > > > > announced > > > > > > properly. > > > > > > I'm happy to answer questions about Stream. > > > > > > > > > > Does the Stream change the way to contributing to a specific > > > > > package on CentOS? > > > > > > > > "It depends". It's a snarky answer, but it's true. > > > > > > > > > One of the main complaints from libosinfo consumers is how > > > > > outdated > > > > > the library is when CentOS is released (we have upstream > > > > > releases > > > > > of > > > > > our database monthly). What would be the best way to get our > > > > > library > > > > > always up-to-date taking advantage of Streams? > > > > > > > > We have to realize that stream is intended to target the next > > > > RHEL > > > > release, so if you didn't see packages being rapidly rebased > > > > before, > > > > you > > > > probably shouldn't expect that to change. If it's a simple fix, > > > > a > > > > feature addition that you've backported, that sort of thing, > > > > then the > > > > vision would be a pull request and discussion, with the goal of > > > > having > > > > that merged in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where will primary discussion and submissions related to streams > > > take > > > place? WIl the primary be the CentOS bug tracker or Red Hat > > > bugzilla? > > > > The discussion will be here on the -devel mailing list. We're > > currently > > using the CentOS bug tracker, but we have been exploring the idea > > of > > using either RH's bugzilla, or Jira (don't make that face). > > > > *makes the face at the thought of JIRA* > > I'd like to see usage of the Red Hat Bugzilla. It'd make it much > easier to connect bugs across RHEL, Fedora, and CentOS... > > I cannot make a face, as I do not believe I have ever had contact with Jira. I do tend to agree with Neal and Pat re RH bugzilla. Easier for the all projects and the people involved in them. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190924/7c4663ed/attachment-0006.sig>