I'm a bit puzzled now -- do I understand correctly that gcc 8.3 fulfills your needs and you can use it instead of the llvm that was previously requested? Honza On 9/3/19 9:37 PM, Ken Roser wrote: > I just learned devtoolset-8.1 is now available Perhaps the effort is > best spent on that package instead. > > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/06/20/developer-toolset-8-1-and-gcc-8-3-now-available-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7/ > > On 9/3/19 11:34 AM, Honza Horak wrote: >> While this is packaged as SCL as well, it is not part of the RHSCL >> content in Red Hat, so we originally did not pay closer attention to >> that piece of sw in SCLo SIG. >> >> It looks like there is some demand now, so we can probably request cbs >> tags for that and try to rebuild that SCL, similarly as we do it for >> other RHSCL content. >> >> Ken, if there would be some troubles with rebuilding, would you be >> willing to help, by any chance? >> >> Honza >> >> On 9/3/19 3:45 PM, Ken Roser wrote: >>> Redhat has had llvm-toolset-7.0 available since March 2019. It adds >>> support for clang and llvm version 7. See >>> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... rust-1-31/ >>> <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/03/29/red-hat-enterprise-linux-compiler-toolset-updates-clang-llvm-7-0-go-1-11-rust-1-31/> >>> >>> Is this going to be available on Centos 7 and if so, when? >>> >>> Don't confuse this with llvm-toolset-7 which supports the older clang >>> version 5 which is already available with Centos 7. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-devel mailing list >>> CentOS-devel at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >>> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >