One more thing I'd like to add is that there are a lot of people who can contribute more help and resources beyond just testing. So right now is probably not a good time but after the release perhaps it make sense to see if more people can contribute. I can't speak for anyone else but I definitely have some bandwidth and maintained an internal build for RHEL3 bootstrapped from src on RH9 and then 4. Then we moved to CentOS. On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:21 PM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 9/10/19 3:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> > >> Then we will get back to CentOS 8 .. since because no one has it yet .. > >> it is not a priority. > >> > > > > It's unfortunate that CentOS 8 has taken a backseat to CentOS 7.7, > > because the release of CentOS 8 is the pre-requisite for a lot of > > folks (including myself) for bootstrapping support for RHEL 8 for a > > lot of folks, since CentOS 8 can be freely shared... > > > > > > Red Hat and IBM need to know how you use CentOS Linux to make RHEL > better or use it to influence buying RHEL .. why don't you blog about it. > > That goes for anyone who uses CentOS Linux and because CentOS Linux > exists, you have RHEL subscriptions. And explain why you would not have > those RHEL subscriptions if CentOS Linux did not exist. > > Thanks, > Johnny hughes > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190910/67236cdf/attachment-0008.html>