[CentOS-devel] CentOS Streams q&a

Tue Sep 24 21:12:00 UTC 2019
Phil Wyett <philwyett at kathenas.org>

On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 16:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:35 PM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/24/19 1:31 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 13:25 -0700, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > > > On 9/24/19 11:50 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:24 PM Jim Perrin <
> > > > > jperrin at centos.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Okay, now that the release is out, and everything is
> > > > > > announced
> > > > > > properly.
> > > > > > I'm happy to answer questions about Stream.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does the Stream change the way to contributing to a specific
> > > > > package on CentOS?
> > > > 
> > > > "It depends". It's a snarky answer, but it's true.
> > > > 
> > > > > One of the main complaints from libosinfo consumers is how
> > > > > outdated
> > > > > the library is when CentOS is released (we have upstream
> > > > > releases
> > > > > of
> > > > > our database monthly). What would be the best way to get our
> > > > > library
> > > > > always up-to-date taking advantage of Streams?
> > > > 
> > > > We have to realize that stream is intended to target the next
> > > > RHEL
> > > > release, so if you didn't see packages being rapidly rebased
> > > > before,
> > > > you
> > > > probably shouldn't expect that to change. If it's a simple fix,
> > > > a
> > > > feature addition that you've backported, that sort of thing,
> > > > then the
> > > > vision would be a pull request and discussion, with the goal of
> > > > having
> > > > that merged in.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Where will primary discussion and submissions related to streams
> > > take
> > > place? WIl the primary be the CentOS bug tracker or Red Hat
> > > bugzilla?
> > 
> > The discussion will be here on the -devel mailing list. We're
> > currently
> > using the CentOS bug tracker, but we have been exploring the idea
> > of
> > using either RH's bugzilla, or Jira (don't make that face).
> > 
> 
> *makes the face at the thought of JIRA*
> 
> I'd like to see usage of the Red Hat Bugzilla. It'd make it much
> easier to connect bugs across RHEL, Fedora, and CentOS...
> 
> 

I cannot make a face, as I do not believe I have ever had contact with
Jira.

I do tend to agree with Neal and Pat re RH bugzilla. Easier for the all
projects and the people involved in them.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

IRC: kathenas
Twitter: kathenasorg
Website: https://kathenas.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190924/7c4663ed/attachment-0008.sig>