[CentOS-devel] @ SIG Openstack / Centos8 repos colliding

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:44 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:23 AM Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 23/04/2020 19:12, lejeczek via CentOS-devel wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Here some bits being in collision:
> > >
> > > virglrenderer.src
> > > 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8
> > > advanced-virt
> > > virglrenderer.x86_64
> > > 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8
> > > advanced-virt
> > > virglrenderer.x86_64
> > > 0.8.0-1.20191002git4ac3a04c.el8                                 epel
> > >
> > > Please push as much as you can over to EPEL. It's way to often that
> EPEL
> > > gets unnecessary confronted by extras/third-parties repos while it
> > > should be taken advantage of.
> > >
> >
> > I disagree here. If something is in centos repos (or RHEL for that
> > matter), the package should not be in epel.
> >
>
> SIG repos do not qualify here. As SIG repos can do basically anything,
> including override CentOS base packages, it's not a mark to block
> inclusion in EPEL. They also don't necessarily map cleanly to RHEL
> content, either.
>
>
CloudSIG repos are not created nor tested to work with EPEL. Among other
reasons CloudSIG support several stable releases which require different
dependencies versions and EPEL is single rolling release.


>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20200424/b9556877/attachment-0002.html>