On 18/04/2020 09:26, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On la, 18 huhti 2020, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 18/04/2020 01:04, Chen, Ming A wrote: >>> >>>> libldb >>>> >>>> dnf install @idm:DL1 >>>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:54 ago on Fri 17 >>>> Apr 2020 16:08:56 EDT. >>>> Error: >>>> Problem: package >>>> ipa-client-4.8.0-13.module_el8.1.0+265+e1e65be4.x86_64 >>>> requires sssd-tools >= 2.2.0-1, but none of the >>>> providers can be installed >>>> - conflicting requests >>>> - nothing provides libldb.so.1()(64bit) needed by >>>> sssd-tools-2.2.0-19.el8_1.1.x86_64 >>>> - nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) >>>> needed by sssd-tools-2.2.0-19.el8_1.1.x86_64 >>>> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable >>>> packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate >>>> packages) >>> >>> Same issue with libldb when I tried to install CentOS >>> Stream using the pxeboot images and the installation >>> failed. Seems libldb was updated to 2.0.7 which broke >>> some dependencies. >>> https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1007 >>> >>> >> >> Yes we discussed this and Carl was already working on >> fixing it. >> I see (this morning, CET time) that during the night some >> jenkins jobs >> validated an updated tree so hopefully should go out to >> mirrors soon > > Can we also fix https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16929 ? > > You always need to rebuild idm:DL1 module stream after you > change/update > Samba and libldb. > > It is quite embarrasing that this is open for more than 3 > months already > with no reaction from however maintains CentOS > repositories and build > system. > > Yes, I too was thinking that a horde of devel would rush to fix that next day. It cannot be just a tiny bunch of IPA+samba users, these two must be critical to many setups. many thanks, L.