On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:23 AM Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de> wrote: > > On 23/04/2020 19:12, lejeczek via CentOS-devel wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Here some bits being in collision: > > > > virglrenderer.src > > 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8 > > advanced-virt > > virglrenderer.x86_64 > > 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8 > > advanced-virt > > virglrenderer.x86_64 > > 0.8.0-1.20191002git4ac3a04c.el8 epel > > > > Please push as much as you can over to EPEL. It's way to often that EPEL > > gets unnecessary confronted by extras/third-parties repos while it > > should be taken advantage of. > > > > I disagree here. If something is in centos repos (or RHEL for that > matter), the package should not be in epel. > SIG repos do not qualify here. As SIG repos can do basically anything, including override CentOS base packages, it's not a mark to block inclusion in EPEL. They also don't necessarily map cleanly to RHEL content, either. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!