[CentOS-devel] kernel-4.18.0-193.14.2.el8_2 in git.centos.org

Johnny Hughes

johnny at centos.org
Mon Aug 3 15:38:34 UTC 2020


On 8/3/20 10:34 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS-devel wrote:
>> On 8/3/20 9:43 AM, Antal Nemeš wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: CentOS-devel <centos-devel-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of Brian
>>>> Stinson
>>>> Sent: Monday, 3 August 2020 16:14
>>>>> I believe 14.3 is exactly the same as 14.2 except that RH needed to
>>>>> adjust the signing order of their certificates and since those are RH
>>>>> specific, 14.2 == 14.3 for the intents and purposes of non-RHEL
>>>>> builds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trevor
>>>>
>>>> This is the correct answer. The difference between 14.2 and 14.3 is
>>>> only
>>>> applicable to RHEL, and is not a change in the underlying content. The
>>>> CentOS
>>>> kernels were dual-signed in the right order for us in 14.2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Brian
>>>
>>> Great, thanks for confirmation. This throws a gigantic monkey wrench in
>>> my attempts
>>> at automating src.rpm generation from git.centos.org, so I hope this was
>>> an exceptional occurrence?
>>>
>>
>> Yes .. one could say that an embargoed, 'named' sescureboot/kernel fix
>> that requires a signature from Microsoft before release AND requires
>> hiding embargoed content (which CentOS is not set up to do ..we build
>> everythign in the open) .. is VERY MUCH an exceptional occurrence.
> 
> Some filtering rules in my brain just triggered an alarm here, too many
> words like 'embargoed content', 'secureboot', 'hiding', 'Microsoft'... on
> a GNU/Linux devel list :-)

You and me both .. :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20200803/02b952fb/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list