[CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform
Gordon Messmer
gordon.messmer at gmail.comThu Dec 24 20:46:48 UTC 2020
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/24/20 12:01 PM, redbaronbrowser via CentOS-devel wrote: > In terms of balancing the needs of the CentOS platform and the > openness gap, the CentOS governance board should be focus on if the > CentOS Stream kernel SRPM should be of the same quality as Fedora's > kernel SRPM. Or if pre-applying patches in a non-open way is acceptable. At that point, is the question you're asking whether or not the CentOS kernel should be a rebuild of an RHEL kernel SRPM? These don't seem like questions that the CentOS maintainers would have ever even accepted for consideration.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list