On 12/17/20 7:04 AM, Dan Seguin wrote: > Not really, no. > > > Read the rest: nobody (i.e. clients) can run anything developed on this > platform without paying for the platform it was targeted for, correct? > > > I think you missed my point. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* CentOS-devel <centos-devel-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of > Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > *Sent:* December 17, 2020 7:44 AM > *To:* The CentOS developers mailing list. > *Subject:* Re: [CentOS-devel] Before You Get Mad About The CentOS Stream > Change, Think About… > > > > Il giorno gio 17 dic 2020 alle ore 13:25 Dan Seguin > <dan.seguin at cord3inc.com <mailto:dan.seguin at cord3inc.com>> ha scritto: > > I see what you mean, and you saw what I meant. > > > Will there be a "free" RHEL distro that people can develop on that > won't need a paid license? > > Like https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/03/31/no-cost-rhel-developer-subscription-now-available/ > <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/03/31/no-cost-rhel-developer-subscription-now-available/> > ? > All CentOS users who can not use stream (many will be able to, if they want .. some will not) should provide their use case to centos-questions at redhat.com Red Hat is absolutely looking to provide more options for previous CentOS users. There is also no reason 3rd party devel will not support Stream. It is absolutely in their best interest to do so.