On 12/28/20 3:50 AM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS-devel wrote: > On 28.12.2020 17:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> You keep ignoring 'no-cost' part there. > It was said "or". "low- *or* no-cost..." Do you see? Not "and", but "or". > > Will I sound too unrealistic, if I say that "low-cost" would be much, > much more probable? That's a totally normal sentence construct for English speakers. It implies that both will exist, and each will be appropriate for different use cases. It does not imply that "no-cost" may or may not exist, only that it may or may not fit a particular use case.