On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > never been involved with the nfv sig, > Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of sig-nfv. > regards > > On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: >> Adding kb as NFV Sig chair. >> >> What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers >> (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has >> been no response. >> >> What's the status of NFV SIG? >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler at gmx.net >> <mailto:Dominik.Holler at gmx.net>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej at redhat.com >> <mailto:amoralej at redhat.com> >> > <mailto:amoralej at redhat.com <mailto:amoralej at redhat.com>>> >> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM >> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast >> > DataPath in NFV Sig >> > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org >> <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org> >> > <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org <mailto:centos-devel at centos.org>>> >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major >> > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem, >> > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each >> > project has been following its own way with limited coordination >> > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different >> > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from >> ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com> >> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> >> > from time to time in their own tags and repos. >> > >> > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources so I >> > think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a >> > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, test and >> > ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath [2]. >> > >> > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming >> > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-sig group >> > [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots for OVS/OVN >> > and start building and testing the required releases. >> > >> > Any thoughts on this proposal? >> > >> >> I think this would be efficient. >> I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help. >> >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Alfredo >> > >> > >> > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV >> > [2] >> > >> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/ >> > [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > CentOS-devel mailing list >> > CentOS-devel at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org> >> <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org>> >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Didi >> > >> > >