Hi, On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:47 PM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > When working with Thomas on new signing process, we decided that we'd > use Koji/CBS as single source of truth, so new signing process should > only query koji/cbs and automatically act when there would be something > to do. > > Creating so a different thread to discuss the koji tags we have. We > discovered some inconsistencies and we think that $now would be a good > time to fix/move those if needed. > > The current proposal would be (and most of the existing tags are > following that convention) : > > <sig><dist>-<sig_project>-<sig_project_rel>-<sig_level> > If we take an example for Gluster 7 for CentOS 7, built by Storage SIG, > that means the following tags : > storage7-gluster-7-{candidate,testing,release} > > The path where new process would automatically push out (to mirror CDN) > would be so based on koji tag : > mirror.centos.org/{centos,altarch}/ > <http://mirror.centos.org/%7Bcentos,altarch%7D/> > <dist>/<sig>/{arch}/<sig_project>-<sig_project_rel>/ > > Once again, if we take the gluster 7 as an example, that would mean that > process would automatically (for -release tag, with three enabled > arches), push to those paths (created if needed) : > > * http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-7/ > * http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/aarch64/gluster-7/ > * http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/gluster-7/ > > The full path is coming from the koji tag, but we see some issues for > some paths/SIGs (like NFV) > > As we think that it would be good to have confirmations from all SIGs > (as they are responsible for content to be pushed out, and also good > time to have EOL content removed), we'd eventually "lock" koji tags for > which we have *not* received confirmation for final destination path. > > IIUC the proposed naming and repos location is the same used by CloudSIG, so i think it's fine for us. WRT EOL, at this point we support: - openstack-rocky (will be EOLed in a couple of weeks or so) - openstack-stein - openstack-train openstack-queens is EOL and can be moved to EOL. Other thing we discovered : some SIGs (in the past) have asked for a > "common" tag but then have asked (through cbs-content-control) to have > content from that common tag to be added in other repo. > > As we'll *not* use cbs-content-control anymore, the way to deal with > this would be : > - either we use koji tag inheritance (preferred solution) > - or you just "tag-build" yourself when needed from one to the other > > The advantage of doing this through koji tag inheritance is the following : > When you request for some tags, and specify what they would need, > nothing else would have to be done and you can just tag-build from > -testing to -release to trigger the sign+push to mirrors (while > tag-build to -testing first would push unsigned pkgs automatically to > buildlogs.centos.org, as usual) > > Can we ask each SIG Chair to see which projects/releases are still > needed and so come back (either in this thread of #centos-devel) > > As stated before: - openstack-rocky (will be EOLed soon) - openstack-stein - openstack-train > Thanks for your collaboration ! > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20200319/4983bd75/attachment-0005.html>