On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:16:56AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il giorno ven 13 mar 2020 alle ore 11:02 Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> > ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:18:29PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > Il giorno gio 12 mar 2020 alle ore 15:01 Fabian Arrotin < > > arrfab at centos.org> > > > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Hi all SIG members, > > > > > > > > When working in our "Staging" environment while validating the new > > > > signing process (still to be announced when fully in use/prod), we > > > > detected some SIGs having multiple variants/versions of their packages. > > > > > > > > Just one example (already discussed with Niels and Kaleb in > > > > #centos-devel but let's just this one a example): > > > > Gluster has multiple versions still listed on mirror.centos.org : > > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ > > > > > > > > As the new process would automatically decide where to push content > > > > based on koji/cbs tag name, we found the interesting corner case of > > > > gluster312. > > > > The CBS tag is storage7-gluster-312-release and so new process would > > > > push to > > > > centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-312/ instead of > > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12/ (see > > the > > > > diff betwen koji/cbs tag and the final path/destination) > > > > > > > > It seems that only Gluster was impacted for older releases, while it > > > > should be good for new releases (tested). > > > > > > > > But so that brings the following request : can you come with a list of > > > > EOL repositories that you'd like us to trim/remove from > > > > mirror.centos.org (they'll be archived to vault.centos.org) ? > > > > Doing that at the same time as we launch the new signing/push process > > > > would be a good idea. > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot in advance for your collaboration ! > > > > > > > > > > For oVirt, you can move to vault: > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.2/ since oVirt 4.2 > > > reached EOL around one year ago and is not compatible with CentOS 7.7 > > > and > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.4/ since upstream > > > decided to drop el7 support for oVIrt 4.4 and have it el8 only. > > > > Last time we dropped some centos-release-gluster packages from Extras, > > but oVirt was still expecting older, unmaintained Gluster versions to be > > available. What version of Gluster does oVirt consume at the moment? > > > > Ideally we archive/drop all EOL versions. The current maintained > > versions are on https://www.gluster.org/release-schedule/ > > > Current supported versions for oVirt are: > oVirt 4.3 (stable): requiring GlusterFS 6 > oVirt 4.4 (in development): requiring GlusterFS 7 Thanks! >From the Gluster project in the Storage SIG, the following repositories can be removed/archived: storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12 storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0 storage/x86_64/gluster-4.1 That also means these package need to be removed from Extras: centos-release-gluster40 centos-release-gluster41 Niels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 858 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20200313/07cb2a1f/attachment-0007.sig>