[CentOS-devel] Trimming/Removing EOL SIG content from mirror.centos.org

Fri Mar 13 12:08:52 UTC 2020
Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:16:56AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno ven 13 mar 2020 alle ore 11:02 Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com>
> ha scritto:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:18:29PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > Il giorno gio 12 mar 2020 alle ore 15:01 Fabian Arrotin <
> > arrfab at centos.org>
> > > ha scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi all SIG members,
> > > >
> > > > When working in our "Staging" environment while validating the new
> > > > signing process (still to be announced when fully in use/prod), we
> > > > detected some SIGs having multiple variants/versions of their packages.
> > > >
> > > > Just one example (already discussed with Niels and Kaleb in
> > > > #centos-devel but let's just this one a example):
> > > > Gluster has multiple versions still listed on mirror.centos.org :
> > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> > > >
> > > > As the new process would automatically decide where to push content
> > > > based on koji/cbs tag name, we found the interesting corner case of
> > > > gluster312.
> > > > The CBS tag is storage7-gluster-312-release and so new process would
> > > > push to
> > > > centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-312/ instead of
> > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12/ (see
> > the
> > > > diff betwen koji/cbs tag and the final path/destination)
> > > >
> > > > It seems that only Gluster was impacted for older releases, while it
> > > > should be good for new releases (tested).
> > > >
> > > > But so that brings the following request : can you come with a list of
> > > > EOL repositories that you'd like us to trim/remove from
> > > > mirror.centos.org (they'll be archived to vault.centos.org) ?
> > > > Doing that at the same time as we launch the new signing/push process
> > > > would be a good idea.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot in advance for your collaboration !
> > > >
> > >
> > > For oVirt, you can move to vault:
> > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.2/ since oVirt 4.2
> > > reached EOL around one year ago and is not compatible with CentOS 7.7
> > > and
> > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.4/ since upstream
> > > decided to drop el7 support for oVIrt 4.4 and have it el8 only.
> >
> > Last time we dropped some centos-release-gluster packages from Extras,
> > but oVirt was still expecting older, unmaintained Gluster versions to be
> > available. What version of Gluster does oVirt consume at the moment?
> >
> > Ideally we archive/drop all EOL versions. The current maintained
> > versions are on https://www.gluster.org/release-schedule/
> 
> 
> Current supported versions for oVirt are:
> oVirt 4.3 (stable): requiring GlusterFS 6
> oVirt 4.4 (in development): requiring GlusterFS 7

Thanks!

>From the Gluster project in the Storage SIG, the following repositories
can be removed/archived:

storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12
storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0
storage/x86_64/gluster-4.1

That also means these package need to be removed from Extras:

centos-release-gluster40
centos-release-gluster41

Niels
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 858 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20200313/07cb2a1f/attachment-0007.sig>