On 5/6/20 1:05 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > I'm inclined to prefer a ticketing system, honestly. That way the things > that are open or to-be-done are easily viewable and up-front. We can > mark issues done, closed, whatever, and people can interact in a way > that's visible without hunting through a variety of threads for a > decision. It also means (in the specific instance of web work) we can > review, comment, and mark up code done and contributed either as pull > requests, linked items, etc. That would be awesome. > CNCF and a number of other projects already use such a model. > > On 5/6/20 9:59 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 06/05/2020 17:01, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> Sure. I get that. What I'm asking, though, is how we, the community, >>> should engage with you, the board, and how we can know that issues >>> raised are even on your list to be addressed, some day, and when some >>> day might be. >> >> I am happy to try an email list. The board meets monthly, for things >> that dont need a sync, we should be able to make progress faster. >> >> regards, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> > -- Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166