On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:59 AM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hm... > > Something is not OK. Do we really need glusterfs-ganesha package ? > you do if you want the integrated support. There's a bug in the .spec file. There's a left-over Obsoletes: that didn't get removed. I'm respinning the packages now. Should be on the mirrors in a little while. > > [root at glustera ~]# yum install glusterfs-ganesha > Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:05 ago on Thu 05 Nov 2020 05:51:09 PM > EET. > Package glusterfs-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > > > > [root at glustera ~]# yum install glusterfs-ganesha.x86_64 > Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:25 ago on Thu 05 Nov 2020 05:51:09 PM > EET. > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package glusterfs-server-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > - package glusterfs-server-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs = > 8.2-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glusterfs-server-8.0-1.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs = > 8.0-1.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glusterfs-server-8.1-1.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs = > 8.1-1.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - installed package glusterfs-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 obsoletes > glusterfs-ganesha provided by glusterfs-ganesha-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > - package glusterfs-8.0-1.el8.x86_64 obsoletes glusterfs-ganesha > provided by glusterfs-ganesha-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > - package glusterfs-8.1-1.el8.x86_64 obsoletes glusterfs-ganesha > provided by glusterfs-ganesha-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > - package glusterfs-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 obsoletes glusterfs-ganesha > provided by glusterfs-ganesha-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install the best candidate for the job > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' > to use not only best candidate packages) > > > [root at glustera ~]# rpm -qa | grep resource > [root at glustera ~]# > > [root at glustera ~]# rpm -qa | egrep 'gluster|ganesha' | sort > centos-release-gluster8-1.0-1.el8.noarch > centos-release-nfs-ganesha30-1.0-2.el8.noarch > glusterfs-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > glusterfs-cli-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > glusterfs-client-xlators-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > glusterfs-fuse-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > glusterfs-server-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > libglusterd0-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > libglusterfs0-8.2-2.el8.x86_64 > nfs-ganesha-3.3-2.el8.x86_64 > nfs-ganesha-gluster-3.3-2.el8.x86_64 > nfs-ganesha-selinux-3.3-2.el8.noarch > > > Maybe the documentation is wrong ? I'm referring to Configuring > NFS-Ganesha server - Gluster Docs . > > Configuring NFS-Ganesha server - Gluster Docs > Project documentation for Gluster Filesystem > > > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > > > > > В четвъртък, 5 ноември 2020 г., 15:08:14 Гринуич+2, Strahil Nikolov via > CentOS-devel <centos-devel at centos.org> написа: > > > > > > Hello Niels, > > I will check it out till the end of the week and provide feedback. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > > > > > > В четвъртък, 5 ноември 2020 г., 10:16:43 Гринуич+2, Niels de Vos < > ndevos at redhat.com> написа: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > generally Niels does the glusterfs builds. I usually only do them when > he's > > on a long holiday. > > > > He's not on holiday though, so I don't know why he's not on top of this. > > Oh, sorry! The subject is about NFS-Ganesha, not GlusterFS packages, so > I didn't really pay attention to is as Kaleb was involved already. > > > But I built 8.2-2.rhel8 and tagged it for release. 8.2-1 was never > tagged > > for release by Nields. 8.1-1 was the last glusterfs-8 build that was > > tagged for release. > > Indeed. A call for testing was sent out, but nobody replied to it: > https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2020-September/000902.html > > Ideally someone tests the packages before they get released. If there is > no reply on those requests, I most likely forget about publishing the > builds. > > @Strahil Nikolov, can you confirm that the update Kaleb made works for > you? > > Thanks, > > Niels > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:07 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I guess only Niels is the only one who is taking care of the builds. > > > > > > @Niels de Vos , I hope you are well and just on a vacation. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Strahil Nikolov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В вторник, 27 октомври 2020 г., 14:59:58 Гринуич+2, Kaleb Keithley < > > > kkeithle at redhat.com> написа: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it's a missing repo. I think the gluster packages need > to be > > > respun with the correct BuildRequires: resource-agents version for > RHEL8. > > > > > > Niels is the one who usually builds glusterfs rpms for CentOS. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > Thanks for your reply Kaleb! > > > > I hope Niels can assist on this one. > > > > > > > > Maybe I'm just missing a repo and this is all for nothing :) > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Strahil Nikolov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В неделя, 25 октомври 2020 г., 05:02:50 Гринуич+2, Kaleb Keithley < > > > kkeithle at redhat.com> написа: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:22 PM Strahil Nikolov < > hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> ... when I specify glusterfs-ganesha.x86_64 (provided > > > by centos-gluster8 ) - it requires resource-agents >= 4.2 > > > >> > > > >> The last package is causing the dependency issue. Maybe I should > > > address that to the Gluster Devel ? > > > > > > > > That's glusterfs, not nfs-ganesha; and, if anything, it's an issue > with > > > the Storage SIG gluster packages. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Kaleb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20201105/18725a1b/attachment-0006.html>