On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:03 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > For the most part there is little in what is delivered onto first ftp.redhat.com and then git.centos.org about what packages are 'shipped' and 'not-shipped'. This means that these differences between CentOS and Red Hat releases have existed in previous CentOS releases for different packages. Usually by the time someone who had a Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscriptions found the discrepancy, the package had been shipped and was considered permanent in CentOS. My understanding that other than by email communication or a manual audit, the only items that give a clue that something is not shipped are modules which in their build state tell the Module Build System what packages are to be included in the compose and which ones are to be filtered out. It's very frustrating. "quota-devel" was my pet peeve, snce it's used to build Samba with full doman controller features enabled. The decisions to use these libraries for build dependencies inernal to Red Hat, but not to publish them to subscrbiers or, now, to provide them only in "Stream" is crazy making and will mess with library dependency resolution when building packages which rely on those components.