On 4/9/21 12:07 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Thus ends the not-bikeshedding part of this message. The bikeshedding part > is: I wonder if "SIG" is the right name / structure for this group? SIGs > generally are focused on more specific areas, right, and this is more broad. > So, where I'm going with this is... "CentOS Stream Feature Steering > Committee"? It's almost like you were reading IRC on Friday when I asked this question. This issue is to track the concept of "a thing outside of as SIG": https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issue/34 -- Karsten Wade [he/him/his]| Senior Community Architect | @quaid Red Hat Open Source Program Office (OSPO) : @redhatopen https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io https://theopensourceway.org | https://github.com/theopensourceway/guide