On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:04 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Yes, parts of Ceph and GlusterFS will be in 9. I've been operating on > the > > premise though that the SIG packages that are landing in 8stream and > > 9stream are for people who are using 8stream or 9stream and want to try > > them out ahead of time. Have I misunderstood? > > > > And BTW, AIUI, I'm not allowed to package them in EPEL. > > Is that because they overlap with RHEL packages? It should still be > acceptable to package them as a module in EPEL. > Yes, they overlap with a) layered products (RHGS, RHCS) that Red Hat ships _on_ RHEL, and b) subsets of those layered products that ship _in_ RHEL; i.e. selected Ceph libraries and GlusterFS client-side packages. And I haven't even scratched the surface of modules in Fedora or EPEL. Stephen Gallegher and I had some conversations a couple years ago when Fedora modules were new about making GlusterFS modules, but the need then for modules was unclear, and I've never looked any further into that. -- Kaleb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210415/a4a94192/attachment-0005.html>