On 20.08.21 19:36, Carl George wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:35 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:28 PM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 8/19/21 11:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 06:05:49AM +0200, Steven Rosenberg via CentOS-devel wrote: >>>>> Even emails like I see for for CentOS 7 would be ok. >>>> >>>> Considering that people have had nearly 2 years to get such notices out >>>> for 8 and it's still not happened I wouldn't hold my breath if I were >>>> you. >>>> >>> >>> I would provide the information if i could, it is not easy to do because >>> of modularity. >>> >>> The thing that builds el8 modules is called MBS .. if you look at MBS >>> operations, one of the things that gets generated as part of the >>> filename. Here is an example: >>> >>> https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=18783 >>> >>> Part of the file name is dynamic, created by MBS at build time. For >>> example, one of the Source RPM filenames generated is: >>> >>> runc-1.0.0-74.rc95.module_el8.4.0+886+c9a8d9ad.src.rpm >>> >>> That is not it's filename in RHEL8. In RHEL 8 .. the filename is: >>> >>> runc-1.0.0-74.rc95.module+el8.4.0+11822+6cc1e7d7.src.rpm >>> >>> There is no easy way to figure out the file names that match up between >>> the two systems. I took me 15 minutes to figure out that one filename, >>> this does not scale. >> >> Everything prior to ".module" should be unique, identifiable, and >> identical between RHEL and CentOS. MBS whacks %dist to add MBS > > Not exactly. Sometimes RHEL maintainers add digits after %dist, which > results in NVRs like foo-1.0-1.module_el8.4.0+123+a0a0a0a0.1. It's > not impossible to parse, but it's much more complicated that just > ignoring everything after ".module". and BTW RH uses the plus sign after module and before %dist : RH:qemu-img-4.2.0-48.module+el8.4.0+11909+3300d70f.3.x86_64 C8:qemu-img-4.2.0-48.module_el8.4.0+885+5e18b468.3.x86_64 is this intentional? -- Leon