On 11/02/2021 07:55, Neale Ferguson wrote: > Actually, I take that back. Compare 7.8.2003 and 7.9.2009 from a local copy of vault - > > # ls 7.8.2003/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 > devtoolset-9-9.0-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-elfutils-0.176-5.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-oprofile-1.3.0-4.el7.src.rpm > devtoolset-9-annobin-8.79-2.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-9.1.1-2.6.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-strace-5.1-4.el7.src.rpm > devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.1.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gdb-8.3-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-systemtap-4.1-7.el7.src.rpm > devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-ltrace-0.7.91-1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-valgrind-3.15.0-9.el7.src.rpm > devtoolset-9-dwz-0.12-1.1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-make-4.2.1-1.el7.src.rpm > devtoolset-9-dyninst-10.1.0-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-memstomp-0.1.5-5.el7.src.rpm > # ls 7.9.2009/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 > # > >From a SIG "sign and push" perspective, there is no 7.8.2003 nor 7.9.2009 as it's always pushing only to Major (so 7 in this case) and it seems that source packages you mentioned are listed there ? => https://vault.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/Source/rh/ -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab