On 01 Jan 18:19, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 6:13 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > > > > I don't think this is constructive. Active members of this mailing list are > > not a good sample of the CentOS community, no matter how you define it, and > > I can't see what an "unofficial" vote can possibly do to promote discussion > > in a positive way. > > Agreed. The people who showed up and did the work, or are doing the > work, get to make the call of what they work on next. > > If you want to do something useful, build a labeled snapshot structure > for internal or even public CentOS mirror use to provide the stable > point releases yourself. I do agree. Please read the material provided by red hat at try to better understand. Make your voice heard at centos-questions at . An unoffical vote here to publicly ask people to resign is one step too much. If CentOS really means that much to you, it seems there will be alternatives, like rocky linux, to meet your needs. You might better go there and provide them some help. I think I might simply unsub from this mailing list because everything has been said about stream and people keep pushing. You should have enough material to make your own choices. Let's just work together to make stream great - working together is what open source is about. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210102/95e8f2b8/attachment-0005.sig>