On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:00 PM Alex Iribarren <alex.m.lists3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On 1/5/21 6:17 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> In my opinion, bugs for CentOS Stream should not be closed in favor of > >> RHEL 8.4 bugs (or any future unreleased RHEL 8.x bugs). Instead it > >> should be the other way around. The pipeline for changes to RHEL means > >> that RHEL 8.4 bugs should be closed as dupes of CentOS Stream ones. > > > > That's a reasonable perspective, but often the RHEL bug has been > > around for quite some time and has far more relevant data to the issue > > at hand. It's not really about RHEL vs. Stream, but rather which bug > > has the most useful information. > > > > I think the Stream team are still formulating some contribution > > guidelines and this might be something to consider as part of that > > work. > > If Stream is truly to be RHEL's upstream, shouldn't the bugs be opened > against Stream in the first place? > That does make sense actually. It might make more sense to stop having unreleased point releases populated in RHBZ and force those to use CentOS Stream "version" in RHEL 8 product in Bugzilla. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!