On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 5:49 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:54 PM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS-devel <centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: >> >> >> > Meetings should cover status - what's been happening, what's >> > planned, >> > and where people can participate. And it's an opportunity for users >> > to >> > complain about what's broken, and ask for help. It is one way to >> > engage >> > with the community, and forces a periodic retrospective and >> > refocusing >> > of the work. It also ensures that this isn't just a couple of >> > engineers >> > doing work inside their company. >> >> I would really want to see the outcome of more frequent Storage SIG >> meetings. > > > srsly? You want more meetings? For three months in a row last year Niels and I sat around on #centos-meeting at the scheduled time waiting to see if anyone else was going to show up. Each time, after about 15 minutes we called it quits. > > When people actually start attending then I'd be willing to consider having more. > FWIW, I didn't even *know* there *were* SIG meetings for Storage SIG... The only ones I knew of were the RDO ones... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!