On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:49 PM Peter Georg <peter.georg at physik.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 22/01/2021 19.33, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:46 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:26 AM Peter Georg > >> <peter.georg at physik.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Is there any ticket (bugzilla or whatever) where I could track the progress of the discussions? > >>>> > >>>> At the moment, nothing that is public. This is larger than a bug at any rate. > >>>> > >>>> Perhaps once there's a process for CentOS Stream community requests or > >>>> interests that are larger in scope, someone could take the time to > >>>> write up something that we can use to facilitate that discussion. > >>> > >>> I agree with you that finding a proper solution to provide further/all > >>> subpackages is a larger endeavour and thus might take longer to solve. > >>> > >>> However can we at least get all subpackages that are available for > >>> CentOS Linux now for CentOS Stream as well? I.e. populate the "Devel" > >>> repository for CentOS Stream with the same subpackages currently > >>> available in the CentOS Linux "Devel" repository. > >> > >> Possibly. I'm not sure it would show up in a "Devel" repo, but it's a > >> smaller set to start with. > > > > So I looked at this: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/Devel/x86_64/os/Packages/ > > > > and noticed that some of those packages are already available in > > Stream in the PowerTools repo. Specifically: > > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/autogen-libopts-devel-5.18.12-8.el8.x86_64.rpm > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/protobuf-lite-devel-3.5.0-13.el8.x86_64.rpm > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/tracker-devel-2.1.5-2.el8.x86_64.rpm > > > > quota-devel should be there, but isn't for some reason. I'll figure > > out why. libuv-devel should land there in the next few weeks as well. > > > > The rest I'll look into. > > libuv-devel is one of the subpackages I'm particular interested in. > Thanks for looking into it! > > Peter The picking and choosing and pruning of "we'll publish some of the RPM's, but we'll either not publish or snip out of the Fedora .spec file devel packages we don't want to support" is seriously crazy-making. quota-devel is in the Devel channel. python3-talloc-devel cannot be found in RHEL or CentOS, even though it's written into the upstream Fedora libtalloc.spec file.I ran into this one backporting Sama 4.13 to CentOS 8.