On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:33:12AM -0400, Mike Rochefort wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:14 AM Mike Rochefort <mroche at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hopefully the data is accurate, I did this fairly late at night :) > > > > I probably should have done some more validation before sending this > off. There are packages in PowerTools that are also in AppStream > (leptonica for example). So in those cases PowerTools doesn't really > get pulled into play. And personally speaking I would ignore all the > i686 packages, I don't think they're fully accurate in the depends. > Thanks for doing this Mike! I'm composing the Bugzilla issue right now, so that data is really useful and I'll reference it. Um... how do packages end up in two Red Hat repos? When EPEL packages get shipped in RHEL/CentOS they end up being retired in EPEL, so I'm assuming in this case packages in PowerTools were meant to be retired when they land in AppStream? Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@michel-slm.name -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210716/7954eb12/attachment-0005.sig>