On Monday, March 1, 2021 8:50 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > On 2/26/21 12:09 PM, redbaronbrowser via CentOS-devel wrote: > > > FOSS organizations can use RHEL to create a Linux distro project but only if a Red Hat employee is on the goverance board of the project? > > You have misunderstood. > > If Alma or Rocky or YourPersonalRebuildProject wishes to use this > offering, that's one of the covered use cases. If your reading of the > various articles implies differently, then I'm sure we can work to > clarify that. > > Your later quote: > > Feb 3rd from Red Hat's Bex: > "... if that project has the goal of producing a Linux distribution ... > don't use Red Hat Subscription Services to create or support your project." > > ... does not contradict this, as it refers to obtaining SOURCE from > subscription services. That has not changed with this new offering. Thank you for clarifing that. So what the Feb 3rd blog post was really trying to say is don't use RHEL source RPMs without the debranding?