On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, at 11:48, Karsten Wade wrote: > > On 3/3/21 6:34 AM, Brian Stinson wrote: > > My suggestion is: > > > > "CentOS Stream 8" > > Additionally, this is consistent with the trademark guidelines[1], > although we may need to amend/fix them to make this clear. (They may not > be entirely consistent on this regard and some we have to infer.) > > Basically, "CentOS" is the name of the project, and it does not carry a > version number. > > The guidelines allow for any number of artifacts (produced things) to > come out of the project and carry a version number, by following the > format of "CentOS Foo N". > > My understanding is the guidelines cover this in scope by design, but if > more clarity is needed, we can capture that for the Board to work on[2]. > > I understand that 'c8s' is there for technical reasons (cf. 'fc' in > Fedora package names); does that mean forevermore that's the way it is? > Or could 'cs9' be a thing? Nothing is forevermore, but we should consider the c8s and c9s technical/branch naming conventions stable (think the API/ABI definition of stability). > > (I don't care per-se, just that it's clarifying.) > > Best regards, > > - Karsten > > [1] https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > [2] https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issues > > -- > Karsten Wade [he/him/his]| Senior Community Architect | @quaid > Red Hat Open Source Program Office (OSPO) : @redhatopen > https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io > https://theopensourceway.org | https://github.com/theopensourceway/guide > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >