[CentOS-devel] Enabling PowerTools by default? (and proof-of-concept alternative)
Jack Aboutboul
jack at almalinux.orgFri May 21 05:17:55 UTC 2021
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Enabling PowerTools by default? (and proof-of-concept alternative)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Enabling PowerTools by default? (and proof-of-concept alternative)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On May 20, 2021, at 20:58, Michel Alexandre Salim <michel at michel-slm.name> wrote: > > My pipe dream (doable, but I probably want to wait for the DNF -> > microdnf rewrite dust to settle) is to be able to declare dependencies > between repos. > > e.g. > > epel-release recommends (repo(PowerTools) if centos-stream-repos) > => this signals to DNF that, hey, when epel-release is installed, flip > PowerTools on, and if likewise PowerTools recommends another repo, it > gets transitively enabled as well. > Not for nothing but this would probably make alot of people happy. Especially those running their own local repos for stuff that need to pull things in from elsewhere.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Enabling PowerTools by default? (and proof-of-concept alternative)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Enabling PowerTools by default? (and proof-of-concept alternative)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list