[CentOS-devel] SIG feedback

Wed May 12 15:26:42 UTC 2021
Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com>

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:50 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:15:20PM +0000, Davide Cavalca via CentOS-devel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 15:18 -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > > If you have been involved in any of our SIGs, now or in the past - or,
> > > indeed, if you'd like to be in the future - I'd like to hear from you.
> > >
> > > I was going to do a formal survey, but I find I need a baseline - I
> > > don't even know what questions to ask.
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear what you love and what you hate about the SIG process.
> > > What you would like to see done differently. What features/services
> > > you'd like to see added, and which we could drop.
> >
> > The main issues I've hit so far are things around the developer
> > experience on git.centos.org and CBS. Notably:
>
> > - the lack of a working PR workflow:
> > https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/228
> > - hard to discover clone URLs: https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/245
>
> Does anyone know if these two will be fixed by the move to gitlab?
>

No to the first, yes to the second. Though I'm pretty sure both of
these would be fixed with the collaborators feature in newer versions
of Pagure, wouldn't it?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!