On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:19 PM Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > If you have been involved in any of our SIGs, now or in the past - or, > indeed, if you'd like to be in the future - I'd like to hear from you. > > I was going to do a formal survey, but I find I need a baseline - I > don't even know what questions to ask. > > I'd like to hear what you love and what you hate about the SIG process. > What you would like to see done differently. What features/services > you'd like to see added, and which we could drop. > > What could be improved: - Missing PR workflow as Davide explained (see https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/4533, two years old). - Missing -devel subpackages (I know this has been discussed a lot and fix is in progress). - I'd like to build, tag and push release rpms (as centos-release-openstack). In CentOS7 we could build and tag by ourselves (although it needed infra action to push). In CentOS8 we need to rely in centos infra to build and publish them in extras repos. What I like: - Specially the automation of the tag -> sign -> push workflow has been a great improvement for SIGs (at least for CloudSIG) > Feel free to respond here, but if there are things you'd like to say > that you don't feel comfortable saying publicly, you can send them > directly to me, and I will anonymize before sharing the results. > > This is certainly not a promise that we can or will implement any of > your requests, but as we work through more clearly documenting our > governance, we want, along the way, to fix whatever's broken. And for > that, we need to hear from you. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210512/16ef7535/attachment-0005.html>