On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:50 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:15:20PM +0000, Davide Cavalca via CentOS-devel wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 15:18 -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > If you have been involved in any of our SIGs, now or in the past - or, > > > indeed, if you'd like to be in the future - I'd like to hear from you. > > > > > > I was going to do a formal survey, but I find I need a baseline - I > > > don't even know what questions to ask. > > > > > > I'd like to hear what you love and what you hate about the SIG process. > > > What you would like to see done differently. What features/services > > > you'd like to see added, and which we could drop. > > > > The main issues I've hit so far are things around the developer > > experience on git.centos.org and CBS. Notably: > > > - the lack of a working PR workflow: > > https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/228 > > - hard to discover clone URLs: https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/245 > > Does anyone know if these two will be fixed by the move to gitlab? > No to the first, yes to the second. Though I'm pretty sure both of these would be fixed with the collaborators feature in newer versions of Pagure, wouldn't it? -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!