On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 6:36 AM Alex Iribarren <alex.m.lists3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 5/20/21 8:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>>>> I'm a bit concerned that "non compatible license" is a bit vague. > >>>>> Would this exclude DRBD, ZFS on Linux, OpenAFS, or nVidia? The nVidia > >>>>> bits seem to be 'yes, it is excluded', I'm less sure on the other two. > >>>> > >>>> Concerning your examples: Afaik the CDDL (ZFS) is considered a free > >>>> software license by the FSF. So I assume this should be fine. > >>>> The nVidia bits are probably not allowed. > >>>> > >>> > >>> OpenZFS has not been allowed per Red Hat Legal, so I don't think you > >>> can do that. > >> > >> Well, as I said: I'm not a lawyer :) > >> But good to know, thanks! > >> > >> Does this mean that legally the same restrictions that apply to getting > >> a package into RHEL also apply to packages provided by a CentOS SIG? > >> > > > > Yes. > > Do you know if OpenAFS would also be excluded from this SIG? We > currently build the kmods ourselves for each kernel release but we would > love to be able to push that upstream. > Unfortunately, yes. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#IBMPL Though at least that one seems to have hope to be replaced with one built into Linux in the near future: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/fs/afs -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!