On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 23:24 +0200, Peter Georg wrote: > On 24/05/2021 22.32, Patrick Riehecky wrote: > > I'm loving the ideas/thoughts/etc here! > > > > Perhaps, we could add a Roadmap item for non-GPLv2 stuff? > > Personally, > > there are just a few items that I'd love to have which are not > > GPLv2. > > I'd hate to block on sorting this out now, when I suspect there > > will be > > some more input/concerns/etc. > > > > Pat > > Just to clarify: non-GPLv2 stuff is part of the proposal. But even > the > the discussion with Neal Gompa). > > These modules are indeed not mentioned explicitely on the roadmap, > but > are included in the third point "Provide packages for further > beneficial > point with improved wording or add an additional point to the > Roadmap. > > What are the non GPLv2 items you are interested in? > All the non-GPLv2 stuff I'm interested in is sadly out due to the > restriction to GPLv2 compatible licenses. > The two modules non-GPLv2 modules I'd probably get the most use out of are ZFS on Linux and the nVidia display module. Pat