On 01/10/2021 20:38, Mike Rochefort wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:12 AM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: >> >> The system is based on markdown documents, rendered through mkdocs >> (https://mkdocs.org) > > Out of curiosity, would there be anything to gain using Antora over MkDocs? > Only asking as that's what the Fedora and CentOS ecosystem documentation > sites seem to be built with. > Well, we (CentOS Infra SIG) like markdown and so reason why we decided to use mkdocs for https://docs.infra.centos.org :-) We got the request from Automotive SIG to also use it so reason why we thought about offering it for other SIGs. We don't use Antora (I don't like it myself but this is my personal opinion so not reflecting the project) even if https://docs.centos.org is built with it (to be clear : we offer the hosting service there, but we don't even build it : it's rendered elsewhere and then pushed to that node) Now if some SIGs would like to use Antora, Jekyll, or else, that would be *trivial* to just adapt our ansible role and ansible variable/list to also point to a specific container/build command and so select in the list the rendering system :-) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20211002/cd8328cc/attachment-0005.sig>