Hello Tomas, On Fri, 2021-09-24 at 12:09 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > Hello, we're interested in hearing your feedback, the CentOS community, > as well as my Red Hat colleagues. > > Within our team (packit, context - source-git repos and workflow) we've > recently discussed what would be the preferred way of structuring > documentation for the source-git workflow. The thing is that the > workflow would be available in Fedora, CentOS Stream (and transitively > RHEL) while having some common documentation hosted in our project's > documentation. That causes fragmentation and the need to link between > various sources. > > I'd like to hear what are your preferences: > > 1. Have everything on the same site If the workflow is exactly the same for all distributions, I would go for option number one, a single documentation site and all references would point to it. There would be no distinction regarding the distribution itself. The site would document a common workflow that runs on all of them. > 2. Link between sites and document only specifics to an ecosystem If the workflow may vary among distributions, I would go for option number two, individual documentation sites for each distribution- specific workflow and would try to reuse all that is possible to reuse among them. In this case, each distribution-specific workflow site will have its own documentation reference. The way of reusing content among different distribution-specific workflow documentation sites could be addressed by pulling the appropriate git repos. Antora (https://docs.antora.org/) seems to be handy for such scenario. Best regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera at gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210924/994e2cd1/attachment-0003.sig>