On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:04 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 9:34 AM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > <ewoud+centos at kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 07:30:34AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:31 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel > > ><centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> C8 has > > >> > > >> nodejs-10.24.0-1.module_el8.3.0+717+fa496f1d.x86_64 > > >> > > >> CS8 has > > >> > > >> nodejs-10.23.1-1.module_el8.4.0+645+9ce14ba2 > > >> > > >> should CentOS Stream 8's package version not be at least == C8? > > > > > >The nodejs:10 Application Stream was retired in April 2021 per > > >https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle > > > > > >As CentOS Stream is the development space for the next minor release > > >of RHEL, this ran into an awkward timing scenario. The > > >nodejs-10.24.0-1.module_el8.3.0+717+fa496f1d.x86_64 build is from an > > >errata after the RHEL 8.3 release, but the release of RHEL 8.4 was in > > >May 2021 which fell after the end of support for the nodejs:10 module. > > >Nothing was ever intended to ship in RHEL 8.4 for nodejs:10, therefore > > >CentOS Stream 8 has no newer builds to work with. > > > > > >In all cases, I would recommend migrating to a supported version of nodejs. > > > > The awkward bit is that nodejs:10 is still marked as the default module > > in CS8, even though it's unsupported. This is not the only example since > > the same can be said for the redis:5 and maybe more. > > Yes, that is indeed awkward, but it is also by design. This is one of > the things we learned and adjusted in RHEL 9/CentOS Stream 9. > Unfortunately, in the case of both nodejs and nginx, this is still a problem on CentOS Stream 9. Personally, I would have preferred there to be no default streams for these given the lifecycle setup for it. Alas... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!